Price Discrimination

Key Terms
Price Discrimination: Where an identical good / service is sold to different customers at different prices for reasons not associated with cost.
Theory

What is price discrimination?


Price discrimination is the practice by firms of charging different prices for the same good or service. There are three different types of price discrimination, however, before we begin to analyse those we will cover the basic conditions and methods of price discrminination.


Three Conditions for Price Discrimination

1) Vendors must operate in imperfect competition and must be a price maker.

2) Consumers must have indentifiable characteristics (age, sex, location) making them seperable into different markets. thus preventing arbitrage / transfer / seepage / resale (all mean the same thing).

3) Different elasticity’s of demand. This allows the firm to charge a higher price to consumers with a more price inelastic demand and a lower price to consumers with a more elastic demand.


Methods of price discrimination

Geographical – Different price in different countries / regions

Time – Higher prices at peak times E.g. train companies

Age of Customer – Child / Student / Pensioner e.g. Cinema or theatre


First Degree Price Discrimination

First degree price discrimination occurs when the discriminating firm can charge a separate price to each individual customer.

first degree price discrimination diagram

  • First-degree price discrimination relies on separation of markets.

  • Seller reaches individual bargain with buyer.

  • Supplier can estimate what the consumer would be prepared to pay.

  • In doing so, the seller is trying to obtain as much of the consumers surplus as possible.


  • Second Degree Price Discrimination

    Second degree price discrimination occurs when the discriminating firm can charge a separate price to different groups of customer.

    second degree price discrimination diagram

    In second degree price discrimination the MC curve is horizontal until full capacity. This is best explained using an example:

    In an cinema the cost of filling an extra seat is zero, until you fill all the seats = full capacity.

    The basic assumption is made that firms maximise at MR = MC (Q1 - P1)

    However at P1 - Q1 there is still access capacity i.e. in a cinema there are still seats to be filled.

    The cinema may as well sell at a lower price (P2) to fill all the seats (Full). This is also the allocatively efficient level where P = MC and consumers gain the most consumer surplus.


    Third Degree Price Discrimination

    Third degree price discrimination occurs when the discriminating firm can charge a different prices to different groups of consumers for example different countries.

    third degree price discrimination diagram

    In third degree price discrimination different groups of customers can be indentified by different with elasticties. The more inelastic consumer groups will face a higher price.
    Advantages of Price Discrimination
    1) Increased revenue

    Firms will be able to increase revenue. This will enable some firms to stay in business who otherwise would have made a loss.


    2) Research and Innovation

    If profit are reinvested, consumers might derive long-term benefits e.g. better quality product / service.


    3) Cross-subsidising products

    Price discrimination allows for cross-subsidising products. What this means is that super-normal profit on one good can be used to subsidies another good that would otherwise be unprovided.


    4) Government revenue

    If firms are earning more from price discrimination then the government will earn more in tax. Tax revenue can then be redistributed to lower income groups.


    Disadvantages of Price Discrimination
    1) Some consumers will end up paying higher prices

    Those who pay higher prices may be poorest e.g. adults could be unemployed. This leads to higher inequality between income groups.


    2) Inefficiency

    Higher prices are likely to be allocatively inefficient because P > MC.


    3) Profits used to finance entry barriers = monopoly

    A firm that uses profit to finance uncompetitive behaviour may then be able to establish itself as a monopoly.